To a degree that few appreciate, the rapid development of the BRIC economies, especially India and China, implies a write-off of trillions in middle class wealth that prices in assumptions of economic dormancy in the rest of the world.

To download the issue go to: http://strategicinvestment.com/issues/si_june_2010_issue.pdf

There is good and bad in this market.

The good is that prices are lower so there are a lot of deals. The bad is that prices are lower, so you’re bound to catch a few losses.

But I don’t mind losses, as long as they don’t take over the portfolio.

That’s a big reason why we try and keep a 20% – 25% stop-loss on most of our positions – because we don’t want losses to overrun our portfolio.

And preventing losses is yet another reason why we like to sell our half our positions when the going is good – because it reduces risk.

Both of these things helped you immensely over the past few weeks.

There is no doubt that last week’s sell-off battered some of our positions. It even triggered some of our stop-losses. So without further ado, here are the positions you need to sell immediately…

• Wits Gold (WGR.TO) for a 33.3% gain. We sold the first half of this position on 10/8/2009. Our overall gain on both halves is 60.5%.

• Prospect Capital (PSEC) for a 21.8% gain. We sold the first half of this position on 2/2/2010. Our overall gain on both halves is 26.4%.
• PowerShares Global Coal ETF (PKOL) for a 1.7% gain. We sold the first half of this position on 2/2/2010. Our overall gain on both halves is 8.4%.
• Market Vectors Coal ETF (KOL) at breakeven. We sold the first half of this position on 2/2/2010. Our overall gain on both halves is 7.85%.
• Market Vectors Agri (MOO) for a 2.3% loss. We sold the first half of this position on 2/2/2010. Our overall gain on both halves is 5.75%.
• Swedish Grains ETF (GRU) for a 14.9% loss
• Money for Gold (MFGD.OB) for a 57% loss.

But today’s update isn’t all about selling and protecting against losses. It’s about spotting opportunity and pouncing on it.

Right now, there is a great opportunity to buy shares in Brazil at 20% or more discounts.

Typically, we have a 20%-25% stop-loss that applies to virtually all of our open positions. But we have a special place in our hearts for Brazil. Because we understand two things about this country…

1) It’s in a huge credit expansion. Lives are becoming better and more people are becoming rich middle-class citizens. This will be a boon for Brazil in the years ahead.

2) Brazil is still an emerging economy. That leaves it vulnerable to big swings in prices. These swings can often time take prices down by 25-50%.

So what do you do when a promising economy has shares that are 25-50% cheaper? You buy.

So now I’d like you to go ahead and buy into the following positions. Be aware, we are already in these positions. What we are trying to do here is simply average down and take advantage of the low prices while they last.

• iShares Brazil (EWZ)

• Itau Unibanco (ITUB)
• Petroleo Brasileiro (PBR)

While you’re in the buying mood, I’d also like you to take advantage of the American tobacco company Altria (MO). Right now, the stock is offering a dividend of around 7%.

This is phenomenal, especially considering how steady Altria’s dividend payments have been for the last 40 years. $1,000 invested in Altria in 1970 would give you nearly a million today had you reinvested the dividends.

This would also complement Jim’s Brazilian tobacco play that you saw last week.

Well, that’s pretty much all for this week’s update. We’re simply trying to rebalance our portfolio by removing risk and buying deals so that you can take advantage.

Until next week,

Charles Delvalle

Co-Editor

Strategic Investment

My first car was a Chrysler.

My dad, a mechanic for over 40 years, hated my choice.

He told me “You’re just going to throw good money after bad on that piece of junk! Sell it now, while you have a chance”. Three months later, the transmission was completely shot. My dad looked at it and told me that the engine would be next.

He was right. This $800 car suddenly morphed into a $3,800 proposition.

Why do I bring up this story? Because it speaks volumes for what’s happening all over the world right now.

Governments everywhere are throwing good money after bad by bailing out their very own “Chryslers”. (Hell, the US even bought Chrysler.)

And the EU has a whole slew of “Chryslers” to deal with. Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece, and Spain. Iceland didn’t help, either.

If you think Greece’s $146 billion bailout was a lot, consider the following…

• A similar bailout of Portugal would cost $171 billion
• A similar bailout of Spain would cost $660 billion
• A similar bailout of Italy would cost $840 billion

We have to be honest with the situation at hand. The EU is struggling to bailout Greece. Maybe it has enough money to bailout Portugal. But gathering the $1.5 trillion necessary to bailout both Italy and Spain will prove to be too much for the fragile union.

Will the US bailout the EU? Or will the EU simply collapse? Those are big questions we simply don’t know the answer to. I’d be shocked to see the US bailout the EU. But stranger things have happened.

The EU is in quite the predicament. And there’s no easy answer in sight.

My biggest concern about what’s happening overseas is how it will affect our Strategic Investment recommendations.

So far, it’s had little effect. Most of that is due to how we’ve positioned our portfolio.

Throughout the past few months, James and I have done a lot of hard research, trying to determine where the economy will go and how we can best profit from it.
We’ve talked about many outcomes. And we’ve hedged our portfolio perfectly to capitalize on each of them.

First is China. This past August, James wrote the following about China…

Far from contributing a solution, China’s stimulus program is aggravating the underlying problem. It is adding supply to a world plagued by excess capacity and collapsing demand.

At that time, he recommended the “spread of the decade”, shorting China and going long Brazil.

Since then, it has worked nearly perfect. We are down about 3% on our short on the iShares China FTSE/XINHUA 25 ETF (FXI) and up 25% on the iShares MCSI Brazil ETF (EWZ).

Even today, economists raised Brazil’s GDP growth expectation for the year from 6% to 6.06%. This will naturally boost all of our Brazilian positions. So far, these positions have done remarkably well. Itau Unibanco (ITUB) is up 35.5%, Petroleo Brasileiro (PBR) is up 40%, Brasil Foods (BRFS) is up 0.8%, and CCR Rodovias (CCR03.SA) is up 26.9%.

The only company James and I aren’t too happy with in the portfolio is Money4Gold. Despite announcing phenomenal results, the position is down about 50%.
At this point, the company is either a tremendous buying opportunity or a dead end. I’ll be contacting the company this week to try and find out. We’ll keep you updated.

Until next week,

Charles Delvalle
Associate Editor
Strategic Investment

To download the issue go to: http://strategicinvestment.com/issues/si_april_2010_issue.pdf

“For well you know that it’s a fool who plays it cool by making his world a little colder.”

– The Beatles

Click here to view the issue

Dear Strategic Investor,

It’s funny how short-sighed the market can really be. But that never means that you should lose focus of the big picture. Your stash of cash depends on it.

Throughout the month of January and February, the fear of a blowup in Greece weighed heavily on the global markets.

But today the outlook has changed. Even though Germany is acting tough regarding a bailout, France has already promised “help”. That was after Greece managed to sell $6.8 billion in bonds.

You see the real problem with debt isn’t really the interest a country has to pay on it. Sure, the interest can become quite painful, but rolling the debt over after previous debt expires is the type of problem that can destroy a country.

Greece has about $20 billion worth of roll-overs it has to worry about in April and May. If it can’t figure out a way to finance that debt, the whole scheme falls apart and Greece turns into a modern day banana republic.

The fact that Greece was easily able to finance $6.8 billion gives the market hope that it will also easily finance the $20 billion coming due over the next two months.

And so investors are pushing markets higher across the globe. I wouldn’t be shocked if the market moved up a few more percent this week.

It’s as if Greece’s problems have been solved.

Except they haven’t. Much bigger problems are right around the corner.

It’s at times like these that you have to ask yourself, what has really changed?

Are politicians in Japan and Europe any closer to solving their debt issues? Is the US unwinding its huge government borrowing? Has a bubble stopped forming in China?

The answer to all of these questions is a resounding “no”.

And so our long-term outlook is the same it was yesterday…and the week before that…and the month before that.

Issuing new debt to solve a debt-related problem is like giving a heroin addict more heroin to help him get clean.

Greece is a debt addict.

The fact that it got financing so easily last week will only encourage Greece to keep accumulating more debt.

Let Greece get clean and go through a good old fashioned detox…like Iceland.

Let the deflation come.

The recent developments bode well for our returns.

As the market begins to take its focus off a blowup in Europe, we should see investors move back into stocks…especially from emerging markets.

Considering nearly a third of our portfolio is made up of emerging market stocks, this is a good thing.

At a recent press conference, Brasil Foods (BRFS) said that growing demand in Brazil should help its margins keep growing. This was after it announced a profit in the fourth quarter of 1 centavo per share, a big improvement over its 10 centavo per share loss a year ago.

The companies in our Little Ice Age Portfolio (KOL, PKOL, MOO, FCG, DBA, GRU) continue to do extremely well. Be aware that our coal holdings (KOL and PKOL) are also being supported by increased electricity demand from countries like China and India. It’s only a matter of time before the natural gas fund (FCG) moves up for the same reason.

Combine more electricity demand with a potentially colder globe and you have a nice recipe for share appreciation.

As for the rest of the portfolio, there are no major changes or news to report.

Have a great week,

Charles Delvalle
Co-Editor
Strategic Investment

It was only a little more than a year ago when Barack Obama’s populist rhetoric helped propel the Democrats into absolute control of the Senate and House. My, how things change.

Last week a Republican won “Kennedy’s seat” in Massachusetts.

Say goodbye to a tax on carbon. And say goodbye to an $849 billion healthcare reform bill. The Democrats opportunity to fleece the tax payer has been wasted on internal bickering.

Perhaps the funniest thing about this win is how much Scott Brown – the Republican who took the “Kennedy Seat” – used to have in common with the Democrats.

He voted in favor of requiring every citizen of Massachusetts to buy healthcare. And just last year he voted in favor of the Northeast’s Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a regional cap and trade scheme.

But Scott Brown is a skilled politician, able to switch his “beliefs” when he senses where the votes are.

He won because he advocated a smaller government. That’s where the votes are.

Obama promised change, but nothing has changed. His “Big Business” fight was in vain as the people who elected him saw how he continued to bail out banks and even car manufacturers. So now voters are pissed at the government.

If Obama plans to keep the Democrats’ majority in the Senate and House, he will need to step up the campaign rhetoric. And last week, he came out swinging.

Not only has he proposed putting a “Too Big to Fail Tax” on banks that took TARP cash, but he’s asking for banks to shut down their proprietary trading desks. Proprietary trading makes up about 10 percent of Goldman Sachs’ revenue alone.

These are things that ex Fed chairman, Paul Volcker has been advocating for some time. Volcker helped destroy the inflation of the 70′s by implementing tough policies that other central bankers just couldn’t follow, like targeting the growth of the money supply to non-inflationary levels.

I’m shocked that Obama is listening to Volcker at all. Up until now, Volcker had been drowned out by Keynesians like Larry Summers. Finally, he’s spoken up and got Obama’s attention.

And Democrats in the Senate, spooked by the Republican win, are suddenly rethinking Fed Chairmen Ben Bernanke’s re-nomination.

All of this has added a lot of uncertainty into the market. The result is that the Dow Jones, S&P 500 and Nasdaq all plummeted last week.

Over the past three days, the Dow Jones has dropped nearly 5%. And even though the Slow Stochastic and RSI are becoming oversold, we could see even more selling.

Corrections usually produce drops of 10-20%. A 10 percent drop would take the Dow to 9,600. But I think this correction could get much worse.

You see, the big reason why the economy has stabilized is because manufacturers are operating more as stores restock depleted inventories.

This historically brings in a flood of cash as manufacturers spread the wealth amongst their employees and suppliers. Inventory growth could easily add two or three percent to GDP in the fourth quarter of 2009, and even the first quarter of 2010. It’s also the first step to a true economic recovery.

The next step, though, depends on the consumer.

With a U-6 unemployment rate of over 17.3% and climbing, consumers can’t afford to buy a new 3D HDTV. They can barely afford the milk.

Making matters worse is the fact that consumer credit has dropped for 10 straight months, hitting levels unseen in over 40 years.

See, banks are actually being responsible by only making loans with a good likelihood of being paid back. During a recession, that excludes the majority of America. And the economy will clearly suffer as a result, since credit affects the supply of money available in the economy.

But that’s what happens during a debt deflation. Debt levels are cut down as people default and pay off their debt. That leaves little else to buy expensive goodies like TV’s.

The second half of the year is entirely up to the consumer. And neither James nor I have any faith.

We’ll get a gauge for how bad things might get later this week. I expect to see the Dow begin trading higher by Wednesday or Thursday and attempt to break above its 50-day moving average. If it fails to get above that moving average, we could see another thrust down.

At that point we’ll have to make some adjustments to the Strategic Investment portfolio to remove some risk. One viable option includes reducing our exposure by 50% and then hedging the rest of the portfolio with a few short recommendations to prevent any further losses should the market keep dropping.

Take care,

Charles Delvalle

Co-Editor

Strategic Investment

When Mount Vesuvius startled rumbling in AD 79, it was time to get out of Pompeii.

Sure, there were those who said it would all blow over. As it turned out, they were wrong. The volcano erupted and buried the whole city under lava and ash.

Now a financial Vesuvius is erupting.

Lord Rees-Mogg is the former editor-in-chief of The Times newspaper and a member of the British House of Lords. His book, The Reigning Error: The Crisis of World Inflation (1974) outlined the fallacy of relying on printing press money to achieve prosperity. He accurately forecast glasnost, the 1987 crash and the fall of the Berlin Wall.

He is currently the editor of the Fleet Street Letter, the oldest newsletter in the English language.

We are in the middle of the worst financial crisis in living memory. And we face a global slump on the scale of the Great Depression.

Never before has so much wealth disappeared in such a short time U.S. wealth has shrunk for six consecutive quarters. The latest quarterly “flow of funds” data from the Fed showed the total net worth of households fell 9.0% to $51.48 trillion in the fourth quarter from $56.59 trillion in the third quarter of last year.

Since its 2007 peak, the Dow is still down 38 percent, despite the recent rally. The S&P 500 is down almost 40 percent.

The meltdown has hurt even the world’s smartest investors. Take Warren Buffet’s mighty Berkshire Hathaway. It’s down 38% percent since January.
This is a crucial moment.

Because decisions we make now will affect the rest of our lives.

The losses are staggering. But they are just the beginning.

Most of the damage is still ahead.

In just a moment, we´ll explain why…

The Government Can’t Fix This

Most people have no idea how financial crises work.

They believe the calming words of Bernanke, Geithner, and Obama. They think the whole thing will “just blow over.”

They say to themselves, “The government will save us. Everything will be fine.”

This crisis is moving fast.

Stay on top of events with critical updates from Contrarian Profits.

These will be delivered via Notes from the Investment Underground, a new daily email service that reveals how you can prevail in the coming bad years.

Simply enter your email below to get your first issue. This service is FREE to readers of this report.

But there is simply no evidence in the historical record that the financial authorities can stop a “great unwinding” like the one we are in the grip of right now.

They can hold it off for a while. They can distort it. They can make it worse. But there is no evidence that they can make it better.

Why?

Because losses are losses. Mistakes are mistakes. They don’t go away when government throws money at them.

As president of Euro Pacific Capital Peter Schiff puts it, “History clearly shows that borrowed or printed money only has the power to destroy.”

Besides, we don’t recall Ben Bernanke warning that the world faced a meltdown when he took over at the Fed in February 2006.

And wasn’t Barney Frank the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee when Wall Street was running amok and inflating the biggest asset bubble in history?

We don’t remember Congressman Frank holding hearings about the dangers it presented until after the thing blew up.

No, dear reader. Government didn’t have the answer to previous financial crises. And it doesn’t have the answers to this one either.

This is a painful truth. And it’s one that millions of Americans don’t want to face up to. But it is critical to surviving the years ahead.

Do you know someone who should read this report? Share it with them by clicking here.

Most Investors Will Be Stunned By Their Losses

Click to play with Media Player

Key points summary:

* Cause of the difficulty is hubris and confidence
* In the excess of the 1920s, the consensus was that risk and pain should be socialized. People who make the mistakes should not be punished
* In 1910, the panic was extremely painful but very short because people were allowed to fail
* Misery is prolonged by government intervention
* Depression ended not by New Deal but by greatest public works project of all time… WWII.

Rick Rule is chairman of Global Resource Investments. He has dedicated his life to all aspects of the natural resource industry. His contacts and knowledge of this market are unmatched.

The shocking reality is that Americans who have prepared for the future in traditional ways could soon be completely wiped out.

In fact, we are convinced that most investors will be stunned by their losses before this financial storm passes. Others will be utterly destroyed.

But we are equally convinced that a small number of investors will not only survive but also prosper in this crisis.

The good news is you are well on your way to being one of the survivors.

You are reading this report because you are perceptive enough to sense something is terribly wrong. You have a growing sense of unease about the future. The institutions you always trusted are now giving you a queasy feeling. You know all is not well.

We congratulate you for your insight. We share your feelings.

It’s now critical you act to protect your wealth. We hope this report will help you do just that.

It has three objectives…

1. To understand how we got into this mess
2. To look at what will happen next
3. To detail ways you can protect your wealth and prosper in this period in our history.

Baby Boomers Will Suffer the Brunt of This Crash

Let us make one thing clear before we move on. This crisis will hit America’s 78 million baby boomers hardest.

We are both boomers. Most of our friends are boomers. And what strikes us most about them right now is that they are afraid.

About James Dale Davidson
Davidson is a self-made multi-millionaire, venture capitalist and best-selling author.

His books include Blood in the Streets, Financial Reckoning Day and The Sovereign Individual.

As an author and editor of private financial advisory service Strategic Investment, Davidson has made a number of bull’s-eye crisis predictions.

*He analyzed the pending fall of the Berlin Wall in February 1989, ten months before the bulldozers started their work.
*Years before the banking crisis, the S&L bankruptcies and the real estate bust became news, he told readers what to expect.
*He forecast the collapse of oil prices in 1986, the 1987 stock market plunge, the meltdown in Tokyo (the Nikkei Dow put warrants we recommended gained 324%), the rapid rout of Iraq in the 1991 Persian Gulf War and the death of the Soviet Union

He is the founder and chairman of the National Tax Payers Union, the largest and oldest grassroots taxpayer organization in US.

His forecasts and his war against taxes and deficits have earned him frequent invitations on programs such as Good Morning America, The Tonight Show and MacNeil-Lehrer.

“I don’t know what boomers are going to do,” said a friend of ours recently.

“I know I’m in good shape. I’ve saved a lot of cash. I began reading The Daily Reckoning about two years ago…and actually started following Bill’s advice. I sold almost all my stocks. I’m in cash in and gold. I don’t even have a mortgage.

“So I don’t have too much to worry about. But I’m worried anyway. I don’t know…maybe it’s just catchy. I’m cutting back as much as I can.

“For example, I was going to buy a new car. I went in the showroom and picked one out and everything. But I think I’m going to cancel the order. Well, the salesman’s not going to get his commission. And I’m going to start doing my own yard work.

“It’s silly in a way. Because I don’t have to.

“But it makes me nervous to spend the money. Which means, there’s some minimum-wage guy who’s wages are about to become even more minimal.

“And I figure that if I’m thinking that way, there must be millions of other baby boomers in worse shape than I am, and they’re probably cutting back as fast as they can.

“Businesses have got to be cutting back too. And when employers look for fat to cut, they’re bound to find the baby boomers. And then what do these people do? They don’t have savings. And they’re not likely to get another job…not in a major downturn. It could be pretty grim all around.”

Has the future ever looked so grim for the boomer generation?

Dreams of a life of ease and luxury over a long retirement have been shattered for many of us.

Congress’ top budget analyst estimates Americans have lost 30% of their retirement plans’ value.

We’re just in the eye of the hurricane.

Let’s not beat around the bush. Retirement security is one of the greatest casualties of this financial crisis. As we speak the next ‘pension crisis’ is crisis is brewing. We’re just in the eye of the hurricane. The five factors contributing to this perfect storm are as follows: mounting stock market losses, overly-optimistic plan assumptions, generous payouts, increased longevity, and a rapid spree of retirements.
That’s why we urge you to read this report carefully. You can also forward this report to anybody you know whose savings are at risk by simply clicking here.

It is critical that more damage is not done. Because unlike Wall Street execs, boomers don’t have a golden parachute to fall back on.

“It’s a culture shock,” says KPMG demographer and author Bernard Salt. “Baby boomers could well morph into the disappointed generation.

“They’ve had, with a few exceptions, 30 years of prosperity, and maybe this is their time of adversity that arrives the moment they are ready to retire.

“Working hard, paying taxes, saving money for their retirement — they get to retirement and their nest egg is cut in half.”

In fact, the situation is so bad that many boomers are now being forced to put off their plans for retirement altogether.

At least seven in ten Americans older than 45 already expect they will have to continue to work beyond 65.

“Baby boomers, particularly, are finding that they need to delay their retirement or come out of retirement to come back to work, in large part because of the decline in their assets,” says Tim Driver, director of RetirementJobs.com, which helps retirees find a job.

The Fed Actually Provoked This Crisis

One of the most important things to grasp right now is that this is no ordinary market correction.

The problem is much deeper and more complex than that…and probably not even one investor in one thousand truly understands it.

You see, what’s actually happening is the bear market that began in January 2000 is finally getting down to work.

- Kevin Phillips, author of Bad Money

Stocks have seen significant gains since their lows in March. That doesn’t mean prosperity lies ahead. What we’re experiencing is a big “sucker’s rally”— just like the one that lured in doomed investors back in 1929.From September 1929 through November 1929, the Dow plunged 47 percent from its high of 381. It then started its famous sucker’s rally of the spring of 1930, before plunging to 41 in July 1932.

Japan also had plenty of sucker’s rallies during the country’s economic slump in the 1990s.

In fact, stocks there rallied at least 30 percent higher five times after 1992. They then found new lows again…and again…and again.

Why do we believe the Dow will drop to 6,000 points again?

We don’t have any inside information, nor do we have a crystal ball. But if you study a long-term chart of the Dow, you will notice something very peculiar. It tends to go way down after it has been way up –- in 15- to 20-year waves.

The top of this wave washed over us in January 2000. Since then, the index has been higher…but not when you adjust it for inflation.

This is critical to understanding the current crisis.

It’s not an insight you’re likely to pick up on CNN. Nor is it something Barack Obama or Ben Bernanke wants to admit.

But in trying to head off a bear market back in 2001, the Federal Reserve actually provoked a housing bubble, a financial bubble a commodities bubble and a worldwide credit bubble.

As Bill wrote in his 2006 best-seller, Empire of Debt: The Rise of an Epic Financial Crisis:

What the Greenspan Fed had accomplished was to put off a natural cyclical correction and transmogrify an entire economy into a monstrous economic bubble. A bubble in stock prices may do little real economic damage. Eventually, the bubble pops and the phony money people thought they had disappears like a puff of marijuana smoke. There are winners and losers. But in the end, the economy is about where it began — unharmed and unhelped. The households are still there and still spending money as they did before. Only those who leveraged themselves too highly in the bubble years are in any trouble.

But in Greenspan’s bubble economy, something awful happened. Householders were lured to take out the equity in their homes. They believed that the bubble in real estate prices created wealth that they could spend. Many did not hesitate. Mortgage debt ballooned in the early years of the twenty-first century — from about $6 trillion in 1999 to nearly $9 trillion at the end of 2004 — increasing the average household’s debt by $30,000.

The US economy faced a major recession in 2001 and had a minor one. The newborn slump was strangled in its crib by one of the most central planners who ever lived. Alan Greenspan cut lending rates. George W. Bush boosted spending. The resultant shock of the renewed, ersatz demand not only postponed the recession, it pushed consumers, investors and businesspeople to make even more egregious errors. Investors bought stocks with low earnings yields. Consumers went further into debt. On the other side of the globe, foreign businessman worked overtime to meet the phony demand.

Wealth Without Work

It´s no secret that the engine that drives the US economy is the American shopper.

Consumer spending makes up about 70 percent of GDP.

It’s no secret, either, that spending is way down.

This October, consumer spending dropped 3.1%. It’s the first drop in spending since 1991. It’s also the sharpest drop since second-quarter 1980.

The spending slump is hitting US retailers hard. Consumer spending has fallen for the 5 out of the past 6 months in April.

We don’t need to tell you that this spells big trouble for the economy.

But what many don’t fully grasp is that consumer spending — the backbone of the boom years that lead to the recent collapse — is nothing more than an illusion.

Because instead of being based on real wage increases, as you would expect, it is based on debt — a mountain of it.

Back in 2003, Bill dealt with this another national best-seller, Financial Day of Reckoning: Surviving the Soft Depression of the 21st Century.

Throughout 2001, the Greenspan Fed did what it had to do, and the only thing it could have done: It cut rates. Month after month, sometimes 25 basis points were cut, sometimes 50 basis points …

Consumers took the bait offered to them by the Fed: lower interest rates … By mid-2001, private-sector debt equalled 280 percent of gross domestic product — the largest debt pile in economic history. Then, in the first quarter of 2002, consumers borrowed at an annual rate of $695 billion — breaking all previous records. Their incomes, on the other hand, rose at an annual rate of only $110 billion. And for the 12 months ending in April 2002, $5.9 of debt was added for every $1 of growth of GDP. By the end of 2002, private sector debt had hit 300 percent of GDP.

What was remarkable about the 2001 recession — triggered by the terrorist attacks of September 11 — was that consumers were spending with abandon.

In 2000 alone, they borrowed another $198 billion against their homes. Two years later, the total was $1.2 trillion.

In other words, the problem wasn’t that consumers lacked confidence, it was that they had too much of the stuff.

They had taken the Fed’s little “coup de whiskey.” And it went to their heads…

This Is a ‘Credit Cycle’ Bust

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge — even to ourselves — that we’ve been so credulous.

We turn here to the words of American astronomer Carl Sagan because they so aptly describe our current economic predicament.

Americans have come to believe the particular bamboozle that we can get rich by spending…that we can get something for nothing.

As Bill put it in Financial Day of Reckoning, “Americans can no more retreat from this dream than Napoleon could have brought his troops back from Germany, Italy and Spain and renounced his empire.”

And here’s where our story gets really interesting.

- John Stuart Mill

Because what becomes clear is that this is no ordinary collapse.

Let us explain…

When left to themselves, the markets are natural phenomena. There is a wonderful simplicity about them.

Failure follows success. What goes up eventually comes down. Like a tree, they cannot continue to grow forever.

We can easily illustrate this by describing the pattern of pig farmers.

When the price of pigs rises, pig farmers naturally raise new pigs to increase production. About 18 months later, these new creatures arrive on the market. This increase in supply causes prices to fall. Farmers decide to cut back, which caused prices to rise again.

This is nothing more than the cyclical boom-and-bust cycle that defined the US economy from the end of World War II to 2001.

Then something changed radically. The Fed, under eager-to-please chairman Alan Greenspan, decided it could avoid the bust part of the cycle altogether.

The result is a different beast from your garden-variety downturn. You get a “credit cycle” bust instead.

This is exactly what we are experiencing now. And it’s more like the post-bubble depression of the 1930s than the downturn of 1973 to 1974 or 1981 to 1982…

‘Catastrophic Acceleration’ of Losses

Here’s the big worry.

The severity of this kind of bust depends on the magnitude of the bubble that preceded it. And the bubble that came before this bust was the biggest ever in history.

In fact, it wasn’t really a bubble at all. It was a “hyper-bubble.”

Now this hyper-bubble has popped, and the losses are catastrophic.

Billionaire investor George Soros recently explained just how dangerous the unwinding of these kinds of bubbles can be.

The typical sequence of boom and bust has an asymmetric shape. The boom develops slowly and accelerates gradually. The bust, when it occurs, tends to be short and sharp.

The asymmetry is due to the role that credit plays. As prices rise, the same collateral can support a greater amount of credit. Rising prices also tend to generate optimism and encourage a greater use of leverage — borrowing for investment purposes.

At the peak of the boom both the value of the collateral and the degree of leverage reach a peak.

When the price trend is reversed, participants are vulnerable to margin calls and, as we’ve seen in 2008, the forced liquidation of collateral leads to a catastrophic acceleration on the downside.

Of course, all this was inevitable.

Bill repeatedly warned the more than half a million subscribers of his newsletter, The Daily Reckoning.

No doubt, many got tired of hearing his warnings. But all he was doing was pointing out the obvious.

A Monster of Deleveraging

Instead of getting a typical bear market in 2001, we now face a monster of deleveraging as the biggest credit boom in history unwinds.

Deleveraging is simply the cutting back on the amount of money borrowed compared to equity.

In the case of this crisis, financial institutions sell off assets to recoup losses inflicted on their balance sheets by toxic mortgage-related securities.

These forced sales push down asset prices, hurting the balance sheets of other investors, forcing more asset sales and so on.

About Bill Bonner
Bill has written two New York Times best-selling books along with his colleague Addison Wiggin: Financial Reckoning Day and Empire of Debt. With political journalist Lila Rajiva, he wrote his third New York Times best-selling book, Mobs, Messiahs and Markets, which offers concrete advice on how to avoid the public spectacle of modern finance.

Since 1999, Bill has been the editor of The Daily Reckoning, a free daily e-letter that now has more than 500,000 subscribers.

Nothing can stop this process. It’s a necessary cure for the credit bubble that Greenspan puffed up.

The problem is it is devastating the wider economy.

As The Economist magazine puts it, “What hurts finance affects the rest of the economy in spades.”

Because of leverage, a shortfall of bank capital of around $100 billion may reduce the potential supply of credit by $1 trillion.

This assumes banking system leveraging of around ten times…the geniuses running Lehman Brothers leveraged 25 times to equity.

But let’s assume that leverage of ten times to equity is about right.

So far, financial institutions have admitted to about $600 billion in credit-related losses and writedowns (net of re-capitalization via new equity issues).

This means cuts of $4 to $6 trillion to the potential supply of credit.

This, in turn, leads to higher cost and lower availability of credit to the real economy. And it forces consumers to reduce debt and consumption, most of which was based on borrowing in the first place.

This is bad enough. But it doesn’t end there…

So-called “negative feedback loops” mean the reductions in consumer spending and investment further hurt the economy. This puts further financial stress on corporations and individuals and triggers more debt defaults and more losses for the financial system. These then reduce lending capacity.

And so on…

Like a giant forest fire, the deleveraging process can’t be extinguished.

And although the government believes it can put the fire out with bonehead bailouts, at the very best all it can do is create firebreaks that limit the damage until the fire burns itself out.

Right now, the bailouts are stopping companies such AIG and Citigroup from going under. But banks are still refusing to lend to each other despite all the money the government is giving them.

The bottom line?

Click to play with Media Player

Key points summary:

* The crisis is not limited to mortgages… Financial institutions are over leveraged
* There is a wipe out of shareholder equity in financial services
* Financial service companies don’t know what their derivatives are worth
* They are keeping liquidity for themselves because they don’t know value of derivatives of others banks
* The US is the leading edge of a worldwide trend of over-leveraged financial services
* An extreme example of over-leverage is Iceland

This massive unwinding is nowhere near finished.

Remember, Wall Street has only admitted to a small fraction of its mortgage-related losses and writedowns.

And the very, very bad news is total losses are estimated to clock in at $2.5 to $3 trillion…

Home Prices Have Further to Fall

This would be bad enough. But these losses will pile up even further as home prices plunge further.

The problem, of course, is property is worth what people can pay for it. The average home has to be affordable for the average buyer. The idea that home prices could rise perpetually was pure bunkum.

For the 100 years from 1896 to 1996, home prices kept in line with GDP, inflation and income growth. It was only in the following ten years or so that they rose remarkably.

Then between 1996 to 2006, home prices rose sharply while real incomes remained stable.

It was obvious a correction was coming.

And when you saw how lenders were concocting mortgages and how people were buying much more property than they could afford, you knew that the correction would be a doozy.

How far will home prices fall?

Depending on the region, probably another 20 percent. Maybe 25 percent.

About 20 percent would put them in the range of affordability. But prices tend to overshoot on the downside, just as they do on the upside.

And if the housing sector continues on its downward spiral, it’s going to bring the value of your savings and investments down with it.

A Vicious Circle That Spells More Pain

Few people understand the US housing market better than billionaire real-estate investor Mort Zuckerman.

He is the co-founder of Boston Properties, the largest US office real-estate investment trust. He was also an associate professor at Harvard Business School for nine years.

Here’s what Zuckerman had to say about the US housing market back in March.

We are looking at the worst set of macroeconomic conditions since the Great Depression. I don’t know where the bottom is.

The most dangerous part in my judgment is what is going on in the housing world, where we’re now running foreclosures at the rate of two million a year, where nine million homes, according to the government, have either no equity in them or negative equity.

That will go up to 15 million if housing prices continue to go down this year as they’ve done last year.

Well, guess what… Prices have continued to decline. And the rate of decline is snowballing.

Year over year, foreclosures are up 18% from 2008.

And there is little indication of a turnaround in sight.

Here is a little data from RealtyTrac to drive home the point:

• May foreclosure numbers were the third highest on record
• In April, 1 in every 347 houses received a foreclosure notice
• Foreclosure filings rose 1 percent from March, 2009, and 32 percent from April, 2008
• The total number of homes lost to foreclosure will pass 1.3 million in 2009
• In California, the nation’s largest economy, 1 in 144 houses received a foreclosure notice

Falling prices are not the only thing putting pressure on homeowners. Stricter mortgage standards now make it more difficult for homeowners to sell or refinance.

Worse still, a tanking economy, massive job losses and record lows in consumer confidence are now feeding back into the housing market.

This, in turn, triggers further job losses.

Talk about a vicious circle.

Our advice?

Hope for an additional drop of only 15 percent to 20 percent. Expect a drop of 30 percent.

All this is straightforward. But it gets more complicated…

We Face a Decade-Long ‘L-Shaped’ Slump

As we’ve said already, corrections are always proportional to the booms that go before them.

Or as Bill has warned in his The Daily Reckoning e-letter, “A correction is equal and opposite to the deception that preceded it.”

Austrian economist Gotfried Haberler put it best in his 1937 book Prosperity and Depression:

The length and severity of depressions depend partly on the magnitude of the ‘real’ maladjustments, which developed during the preceding boom and partly on the aggravating monetary and credit conditions.

This is just Newton’s Third Law applied to economics.

Every action produce an equal and opposite reaction. A bubble pops and becomes an anti-bubble.

When wild spending and borrowing caused the bubble, the resulting anti-bubble will be marked by exaggerated thrift, debt cancellation and pessimism.

And herein lies the rub…

Given the crazy things leading up to the correction, you simply have to expect that this correction will be devastating.

How will it play out over the coming years? What will it look like?

A V-shaped recession is short and shallow like in 1990 to 1991. These recessions lasted about eight months. A U-shaped recession is longer and possibly deeper. A W-shaped recession is a double dip such as the one that hit in 1980 and 1981/1982).

An L-shaped recession is like the experience in Japan in the 1990s.

Nouriel Roubini, one of the few economists that saw this crisis coming, says the current crisis could trigger a Japanese-style slump.

The crisis was caused by the largest leveraged asset bubble and credit bubble in the history of humanity –- where excessive leveraging and bubbles were not limited to housing in the US but also to housing in many other countries and excessive borrowing by financial institutions and some segments of the corporate sector and of the public sector in many and different economies.

A housing bubble, a mortgage bubble, an equity bubble, a bond bubble, a credit bubble, a commodity bubble, a private equity bubble, a hedge funds bubble are all now bursting at once in the biggest real sector and financial sector deleveraging since the Great Depression.

At this point, the recession train has left the station; the financial and banking crisis train has left the station. The delusion that the US and advanced economies contraction would be short and shallow -– a V-shaped six month recession -– has been replaced by the certainty that this will be a long and protracted U-shaped recession that may last at least two years in the US and close to two years in most of the rest of the world.

And given the rising risk of a global systemic financial meltdown, the probability that the outcome could become a decade long L-shaped recession -– like the one experienced by Japan after the bursting of its real estate and equity bubble –- cannot be ruled out.

And as contrarian investor and colleague Mish Shedlock argues, the US experience could be even worse than Japan’s “lost decade” for the following reasons.

• US consumers are in much worse debt shape than Japan.
• There is global wage arbitrage now that did not exist to a huge degree in the mid to late 1990s. Even white-collar jobs are increasingly at risk.
• The savings rate in the US is in far more need of repair than what Japan faced. This will be a huge drag on future spending and slow any recovery attempts.
• Japan faced a huge asset bubble (valuation) problem. The US faces both a valuation problem (what debt on the books is worth) and a rampant overcapacity issue as well.
• Japan had an internet boom to help smooth things out. There is no tech revolution on the horizon that will provide a huge source of jobs.

Booms Can’t Go On Forever

Like death, no one likes economic corrections. But like death, they clear away the old mistakes and the old wood. And in doing so, they are both essential and helpful.

We are well aware that this goes against the grain. But let’s face it. You can’t win ‘em all. Losses are inevitable.

“Loss is nothing else but change, and change is Nature’s delight,” as Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius once wrote.

Booms cannot go on forever…and nor should they.

When people borrow too much money, the day eventually comes when things change and they have to pay it back.

Click to play with Media Player

Key points summary:

* Global credit markets are broken
* A world existing on credit is going to have to adjust to living within its means
* The asset class everyone is concerned about is residential mortgages. They should be concerned about commercial mortgages
* Rent payments reflected economic good years… That won’t continue
* There will be defaults on commercial mortgages
* Same with consumer debt. As income is reduced, there will be defaults
* That consumer debt has been securitized and sold to pension funds and mutual funds. This will exacerbate the current situation.
* Leveraged buyout loans will suffer… Repricing by 10-15% wipes out equity.

Or to put it another way, when the party gets too wild for too long somebody inevitably ends up in rehab.

In this period of rehab, corporations, investors and households pull themselves together. They need to get rid of houses, projects, businesses and speculations that they can’t afford.

The credit-cycle bust then enters a “balance sheet recession,” as economist Richard Koo puts it, not a standard business cycle recession.

It is a time when businesses, investors and householders realize that if they don’t cut back they could go broke.

Balance sheets must be repaired. Debts must be paid off. And expenses, so that revenues can support them.

And something needs to be left over to pay down debt and build up savings.

This is difficult, because revenues are falling too. And because one man’s expense is another man’s income.

The man who saves a dollar by not taking a cab denies a taxi driver a dollar of revenue…who then buys a dollar less of gas…or a dollar less of clothing…or a dollar less of beer.

It’s what economists call the “fallacy of composition”: the mistaken idea that what is good for one person is necessarily good for the whole lot.

Cutting back on spending is clearly good for the individual. But it does to an economy what a visit from a sniffling grandson does to a bedridden great-grandmother.

Soon, the old lady is dead.

Of course, the feds are fighting this every step of the way.

Just as the Japanese did in the 1990s…

We Are Now Japanese Too

If you think it’s bad being an American right now, spare a thought for the poor Japanese.

Stay on top of events with critical updates from Contrarian Profits.

These will be delivered via Notes from the Investment Underground, a new daily email service that reveals how you can prevail in the coming bad years.

Simply enter your email below to get your first issue. This service is FREE to readers of this report.

The Japanese investor who bought stocks in 1982 when he was 35 years old is now 61…and his stocks are not worth a cent more!

And this week he got the news that the Japanese economy is once again in recession.

During its own post-real-estate-bubble slump, Japan ran deficits of six percent of GDP

Its central bank took interest rates down to near zero and left them there for years.

Sound familiar?

Still, Japanese investors are about $15 trillion poorer than they were 18 years ago.

President Obama is about to follow the lead of Hata, Obuchi, Mori and Murayama. He is promising to throw good money after bad — taxpayers’ money, of course — to ‘fix’ the economy.

Ben Bernanke, too. He slashed rates…just as the Bank of Japan did.

He has also adopted Japanese style “quantitative easing.”

This is central bank speak for flooding the system with excess liquidity. It’s a last ditch effort to puff up credit after central banks have dropped rates to near-zero levels and are running out of options for ‘stimulating’ the economy.

But there is a crucial difference between Japan and the US: Japan had a healthier economy with a positive trade balance and huge savings.

The government could easily spend six percent of its GDP trying to replace private spending with government spending.

The Japanese saved 19 percent of GDP. So, the government could simply borrow from its own people — as the US did to finance World War II.

But America can’t finance huge deficits internally.

It doesn’t have the money…

Its people don’t save…

Any money the government gets from Americans will have to come from current private spending or from other investments.

Obviously, this is not going to do much good, since there is no net increase in spending or investing.

Nor can the US government expect to bring in unlimited financing from foreign sources. Foreigners save. But they need their money to rescue their own economies.

And not only did Japan have a cushion of cash to comfortably sit out the correction, it also had no reason to do otherwise.

With money in the bank, total economic breakdown never really threatened the Japanese. What money they owed, they owed to themselves.

The United States does not have this comfort.

Post-1929 Rescue Didn’t Work Either

Uncle Sam didn’t do much better in ‘fixing’ the Great Depression.

Why?

It’s simple, really: Presidents Hoover and Roosevelt lacked faith in the marketplace.

In this respect, they were no different to Barack Obama.

Just like their 21st century successors, Hoover and Roosevelt acted as though government management of the economy was the only solution the country’s economic problems.

But the real problem was, and still is, government intervention.

Hoover’s introduction of international trade tariffs under the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act is an obvious example.

Rather than helping protect the wounded US economy, as Hoover had hoped, it cut American imports and exports in half and is widely recognized as a catalyst for the Great Depression.

Roosevelt’s government programs were also to blame for drawing out America’s economic woes.

That’s not to say all were a disaster. Some, like the establishing of the Securities Exchange Commission, had a stabilizing effect at the time.

But as Bloomberg columnist Amity Shlaes points out in her history of the Great Depression, The Forgotten Man, “Other institutions, such as the National Recovery Administration, did damage.”

The NRA … sought to solve the monetary challenge through price setting. NRA rules were so stringent they perversely hurt businesses. They frightened away capital, and they discouraged employers from hiring workers. Another problem was that laws like that which created the NRA — and Roosevelt signed a number of them — were so broad that no one knew how they would be interpreted. The resulting hesitation in itself arrested growth.

Sprawling government programs designed to fix the economy. Laws “so broad that nobody knew how they would be interpreted.”

Ring a bell?

As Roosevelt put it in his second inaugural address, he “sought unimagined power” to turn the economy around.

But Roosevelt wasn’t a patch on today’s Treasury Secretary…

On October 3, 2008, Public Law 110-343 bestowed upon Paulson, and now Geithner, perhaps the most incredible powers ever bestowed on one person over the economic and financial life of the nation.
The 451-page law created not only created the $700 billion Troubled Assets Relief Program, it also gave the US Treasury Secretary almost dictatorial powers.

Consider this passage from the first draft of the bill.

Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.

Or these two humdingers…

The Secretary is authorized to take such actions as the Secretary deems necessary to carry out the authorities in this act without regard to any other provision of law regarding public contracts.

Any funds expended for actions authorized by this Act, including the payment of administrative expenses, shall be deemed appropriated at the time of such expenditure.

Roosevelt may have sought “unimagined power,” but he was never brave enough to try to sign such powers into law.

You see Bernanke, Geithner and Obama really do believe the best path to calming the current crisis is to throw huge amounts of taxpayers’ money at banks, credit card companies, automakers and anyone else with a lobbyist with deep enough pockets to get his foot in the door of the Treasury Department.

But they’re all missing a fundamental point.

As Shlaes puts it:

The big question about the American depression is not whether Germany and Japan ended it. It is why the Depression lasted until the war. From 1929 to 1940, from Hoover to Roosevelt, government intervention helped to make the Depression Great.

Austrian School economist and father of modern Libertarianism Murray Rothbard reviewed the record of the post-1929 rescue team and came to the following conclusion.

The Hoover and Roosevelt administrations met the challenge of the Great Depression by acting quickly and decisively, indeed almost continuously … putting into effect the greatest program of offense and defense against depression ever attempted in America [using] every tool, every device of progressive and enlightened economics, every facet of government planning to combat the depression.

Yet the depression didn’t go away. It intensified. Real wage increases and higher government spending smothered an expected recovery in 1931.

The guilt for the Great Depression must, at long last, be lifted from the shoulders of the free-market economy and placed where it properly belongs: at the doors of politicians, bureaucrats and the mass of ‘enlightened’ economists. And in any other depression, past of future, the story will be the same.

A Titanic Rescue

Yet on the announcement of the US government’s $700 billion bailout plan, stock markets all over the world breathed a sigh of relief…albeit brief.

This is not unusual.

As we’ve already pointed out, after the October crash in 1929, stocks rallied until April. Then they started to slide again and did not fully recover until the 1950s –- more than 20 years later.

Investors can always find reasons for optimism…when they’re in the mood. After so many years of rising prices, the momentum of a bull market keeps them hoping.

It was as though the passengers on the Titanic had seen in the distance what looked like a flotilla of rescue boats on the horizon.

Hats were tossed in the air. Life preservers were cast off. Investors cried “Hosanna!” and shouted “Yippee!” The band broke off playing Nearer Thy God to Thee and picked up a soaked version of Laissez les Bon Temps Roulez!

A couple of days later, the rescue boats drew closer…and passengers jaws dropped when they realized they were just more icebergs! Stocks sold off again.

At roughly $8 trillion, the credit crisis already clocks in as the most expensive endeavor in American history. It’s more than the country spent fighting Hitler and his allies in World War II.

And banks still aren’t lending!

Washington simply doesn’t get it.

As Rothbard puts it:

The depression is the ‘recovery’ process, and the end to the depression heralds the return to normal and to optimum efficiency.

The depression, then, far from being and evil scourge, is the necessary and beneficial return of the economy to normal after the distortions imposed by the boom. The boom, then, requires a ‘bust.’

But after sinking the Titanic of Wall Street and the dinghies of homeowners by giving away too much easy credit, our modern-day rescuers have come to the scene with life preservers of lead: more easy credit.

The Dollar Has Become a Faith-Based Currency

This time around, the markets are not just correcting speculative excess, as they did in the panic of 1907 or in the crash of 1987.

Nor is this just a bear market like the one that followed the great bull-market peak of 1966.

That would be bad enough. The 16-year post-1966 bear market took the Dow down to a level it hadn’t seen -– in terms of price to earnings -– since the 1930s.

If that were to happen now, you could expect prices to fall for another eight years -– or until 2016. You could also expect the Dow to drop to under 5,000 points.

No. It’s not just that you have to worry about.

There’s also that little event that happened in the middle of that bear market –- on Sunday, August 15, 1971.

Do you remember? We do.

The Nixon administration had its back to the wall.

Inflation rates were growing as the government spent more and more. Soon, they were bumping over ten percent a year.

At this rate, bonds –- including US Treasury bonds -– were getting wiped out. Treasuries carried a coupon of only five or six percent.

At ten percent inflation, the owner was losing money.

As a result, investors dumped bonds, which soon earned the moniker “certificates of guaranteed confiscation.”

The lesson wasn’t lost on the foreigners.

Every time an American bought something from overseas, dollars ended up in foreign hands.

Does that sound familiar?

It should. About $2 billion a day now leaves the US.

Of course, the amount was much lower back in then. But the principle was the same.

When French president Charles de Gaulle saw what was happening, he told his ministers to get right over the Washington and redeem their dollars into gold at the rate fixed by the US Treasury: $35 an ounce.

The Nixon administration was aghast. The French were calling away US gold. And behind them was a whole line of foreigners. If this continued, Uncle Sam soon wouldn’t have any more gold.

Rather than do the honorable thing, Nixon reneged on the solemn promises of six generations. He refused to exchange gold for dollars at the promised rate.

Since 1971, it has been impossible to exchange dollars for gold at a fixed rate.

That is precisely the path that we began over four years ago in pursuit of our own national interest and we have not wavered on that critical path despite the untold misunderstanding, vilification and demonization we have endured from across the political divide.

- Dr G Gono, govenor of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe

The dollar has become a “faith based” currency instead.

It floats on sentiment, like everything else in the marketplace. It buys whatever people are willing to give you for it. Including gold.

We add an obvious footnote here. The difference between dollars and most other assets is that dollars are exceptionally cheap to produce.

In fact, the profit margin on a $100 bill may be about the highest in the world.

As Ben Bernanke puts it, the government can produce dollars at “negligible expense.”

Therein, of course, is a great temptation. If you can produce cash at no cost, why not produce more?

And this is where our story takes another twist…

Because now, just as they had the idea that inflation would always be a problem in the 1970s, investors have come to believe it is always under control in the 2000s.

People fear dandruff now more than they fear inflation.

They could to be right. But not for long…

A Mountain of Debt

There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it’s only a hundred billion. It’s less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.

- Richard Feynman

The US government has already committed more than $12.7 trillion on behalf of American taxpayers to ‘fixing’ the economy — or half the value of everything produced in the nation last year.

How much these rescues will ultimately cost is a mystery.

Where does this money come from?

Certainly not from savings as during Japan’s lost decade. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) recently said this years budget deficit is nearly 1.7 trillion dollars, more than 400 billion larger than forecast two months ago.

National debt just passed the $11 trillion level.

The numbers are so staggeringly high, the folks who own the national debt clock in New York had to add a digit!

US debt is now feeding on itself. It grows even when the feds keep spending flat. This happens because the interest is so great -– about $1 billion every day -– that the government now has to borrow to pay the interest.

Meanwhile, unofficial national debt -– what’s known euphemistically as the “financing gap” -– is over $50 trillion. And it’s rising very fast.

It gets worse.

Next year’s actual deficit will be closer to $2 trillion than $1 trillion.

This is the estimate put out by Morgan Stanley’s lead economist, who merely assumes that things don’t go exactly as planned.

A $2 trillion deficit equals 12 percent of GDP.

Where will the government get this money?

Not from its citizens. They’re flat broke. And not from Europe, either. Germany, Italy and France still have savings -– about ten percent of GDP -– but they need every penny to cover their own deficits.

Even the entire pile of Chinese-held dollars would finance only about half the US deficit.

What about energy exporters Russia, the Persian Gulf states and Venezuela? Forget it.

At the height of the oil bubble, net capital imports into their sovereign wealth funds were running at something like $2 billion a day. At that rate, an entire year’s worth wouldn’t cover the anticipated US deficit for four months.

Even if it were possible to borrow the kind of money the US needs to service its debt, it would raise serious problems.

It’s the same problem faced –- and ignored –- by government in 1929 and 1990. In both cases government spending rose and private spending fell.

It makes sense. There are only so many resources in an economy. Either people use them for their own ends, or the government commandeers them.

When government takes them, it is taking away from somewhere else. This happens through taxation or borrowing.

- Robert Louis Stevenson

This will come as a shock to American and British readers who are accustomed to the “win-win” ethos of the Reagan/Thatcher years.

But the pie of savings has limits. Take a slice away and you’ve got less left.

Take that slice and use it to fund more concrete, pay more educators or prop up more zombie banks, and you’ve got a “lose-lose” situation. The resources disappear, and you have nothing to show for it.

In short, people get poorer when the government tries to ‘rescue’ the economy with borrowed money.

Interest Rates Will Rise

There’s still one other problem.

Borrowing money on such a scale carries serious consequences for the debt markets.

If lenders are still willing and able to lend, of which there is no guarantee, they will want higher rates of interest.

Interest rates respond to the law of supply and demand just like everything else. Increase the demand for loans, and the price of them –- interest rates -– are bound to go up.

But higher interest rates slow down the economy. This is just the thing the government is trying to avoid.

In this sense, borrowing is not inflationary at all. It’s deflationary. It doesn’t increase the supply of money, only its cost.

But don’t worry, dear reader. The United States of America is not really going to borrow trillions more dollars to stop the correction.

It’s not going to because it doesn’t need to.

“We have a little technology called the printing press,” mused Ben Bernanke…

The Road to Disaster

Eventually, the unyielding logic of printing-press money is going to get the best of America’s financial leaders.

Just as Roosevelt did back in the 1930s, they believe they have to spend trillions of dollars to ‘save’ the economy.

But what the economy needs is new money that isn’t taken from somewhere else. It needs more spending power, not just spending power than has been shuffled around.

No government has been able to resist the appeal of printing more money –- not for more than a few decades.

Thanks to Paul Volcker, the US has done exceptionally well. The government hasn’t backed the dollar with gold since 1971…and the fiat currency still isn’t worthless.

But as this global financial crisis deepens, the ability of foreign creditors to pay for America’s nationalizing programs will be greatly reduced.

At the beginning of November, China announced an economic stimulus package of its own. The communist dictatorship that runs the place wants to spend $586 billion on various Japanese-style public works projects.

China holds roughly $1 trillion in US securities. This includes $541 billion in US Treasuries and a further $200 billion in so-called “agency securities.” These are securities issued by American GSEs such as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or the Federal Home Loan Banks.

If China decides to sell these securities, at a time when the US government is already expected to issue large amounts of debt to finance its own economic stimulus measures, America is going to find itself in deep, deep trouble.

Why?

Because this would further raise borrowing costs, such as mortgage rates, which are benchmarked to bond yields.

The effect could be cataclysmic. A raising of rates would trigger more mortgage defaults, more bank writedowns, more stock plunges and more unemployment.

(Do you know people who would be affected by this? Help us spread the word to other concerned investors, baby boomers and retirees. You can forward this report to anybody you know whose savings are at risk by simply clicking here.)

This is the nightmare scenario that is keeping John Whitehead awake at night.

Whitehead, now 86, is a former chairman of Goldman Sachs and deputy secretary of state under Ronald Reagan.

- Peter Schiff
President of Euro Pacific Capital

Like us, he believes the US economy faces a slump deeper than the Great Depression. He also believes that the growing deficit threatens the credit of the United States itself.

In a recent interview with Reuters, Whitehead said, “I see nothing but large increases in the deficit, all of which are serving to decrease the credit standing of America.

“Before I go to sleep at night, I wonder if tomorrow is the day Moody’s and S&P will announce a downgrade of US government bonds. Eventually US government bonds would no longer be the triple-A credit that they’ve always been.”

Make no mistake about it: The bankruptcy of the US government is well within the realm of possibility.

The US government is playing a game of Russian “debt roulette” that it can’t afford to lose.

There is already a funding crisis. And the country will have to sell a lot more bonds next year to finance the bailout packages that have already been signed off.

But there’s one more strong argument that makes us believe that, sooner or later, the feds will turn to the printing presses rather than foreign borrowers to fund its spiraling bailout costs…

This Kind of Crisis Runs Downhill

In the beginning, the financial crisis mainly hurt investors and Wall Street institutions.

But as it has spread, the meltdown in the financial sector has started to hammer the wider economy.

Now, businesses and consumers are cutting back –- and cutting back hard.

As our friend Doug Casey said recently, “This kind of crisis runs downhill. First, it was only the bankers who were panicking. Then, it was investors. Now, it’s businessmen. And soon, it will be consumers.”

(Doug knows about financial crises. In 1979, he wrote a book about them called Crisis Investing. This became the largest selling financial book in history. It was number one on the New York Times Best Seller list for a total of 12 weeks.)

As unemployment rises, it will become harder and harder for the average person to pay his bills.

And, boy, is unemployment rising.

According to David Leonhardt in The New York Times, “the share of adult men with jobs — which has been gradually falling for much of the last few decades — is now at its lowest level since the Labor Department began keeping records in 1948.”

It’s not just blue-collar workers who are being axed either. Wall Street big spenders are also getting whacked in record numbers.

Big banks have already fired about 150,000 workers. And they are reportedly planning to lay off at least an additional 15 percent.

Goldman Sachs recently showed 3,200 suits the exits, about ten percent of its workforce.

Citigroup says it will axe more than ten times that amount –- 52,000 employees –- by the end of next year.Leonhardt says this puts us on the path to the worst recession since the early 1980s.

But there’s a twist…there almost always is.

Former Oppenheimer analyst Henry Blodget says the recession in the early 1980s came after then Fed chairman Paul Volcker raised rates to nearly 20 percent.

You can reasonably expect jobless numbers to rise under these circumstances.

But the current tsunami of job losses is happening at a time when the Fed, joined by central banks around the world, is doing the exact opposite.

The Fed is so desperate to reinflate the economy, it has actually brought interest rates down to zero!

This makes the comparison with the 1980s ridiculously optimistic.

It brings us back to the vicious circle at the heart of this crisis…

Approximately 2.4 million homes will go into foreclosure this year.

Leading the forecloseure charge are the likely suspects, California, Arizona, Florida, and Nevada. Following close behind are the rust belt states, who’ve been hit especially hard as manufacturing has come to grinding halt.

The top 10 states accounted for nearly 77 percent of total properties with foreclosure filings nationwide.

Now, imagine that the unemployment rate keeps climbing, which it will. And imagine those 30 million or so unemployed people – with their mortgages, their credit cards, their home equity lines, their student loans – and ask yourself, “Which way will they vote?”

Click Here to Play with Media Player

Keypoints summary:

* The grandaddy of the problems in the US will be state and local bonds.

* Local governments enjoyed a bull market in property and retail taxes.
* Demand for services from governments goes up in recession.
* California needs $7 billion. Revenues are falling.
* We’ll see a wave of muni-bond defaults without equal since the depression.
* It’s a prefect storm, with income down and no ability to refinance.
* It’s setting up biggest bailout in history.
* But, who is going bailout the Fed?

For the man who offers to protect the dollar? Or for the man who offers ‘relief’?

How Democracy Works

George Bernard Shaw was right: “A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.”

Gradually, people come to get more and more benefits. They ask for subsidies. They look for angles. They expect jobs. They want free health care and old age pensions. And gradually, the nature of democracy changes as more and more voters come to rely on the government.

In the 1980s, the Reagan administration found it could get support for tax cuts…but only by promising that it wouldn’t cut spending.

In fact, the Reagan administration argued that tax cuts would produce more money to spend! Cut the rates, argued Reaganite economist Art Laffer, and the revenue will increase. (Laffer’s theory was said to be devised on a napkin – definitely not a good measure of academic rigorousness)

Now the process of democratic corruption has gone even further…

The government is giving out more food stamps than ever before. There are more people on Social Security than ever before –- with a huge increase coming as the baby boomers retire. And more people than ever before now expect healthcare giveaways and free drugs from the government.

Finally, there are more people getting money from the federal government than there are taxpayers.

One in every six dollars of American income now comes from the government in the form of checks or vouchers. One in six.

Well…you can see where this leads.

“Democracy is a system where two wolves and one sheep vote on what to have for dinner,” said one wag. He must have been thinking of modern US government.

That’s why Republicans and Democrats in the recent election campaign both promised more spending. Deficits be damned!

Just as the logic of democracy leads inexorably towards more spending, the logic of democratic economics leads to inflation.

You see, more voters will gain from inflation than who will lose from it. Inflation will relieve the debts of the multitude of debtors. But it will destroy the savings of the creditors, too.

There are fewer creditors than debtors…and many of the biggest creditors are foreign governments, who don’t vote in US elections.

This Is Not a Crisis…It’s a Collapse

One last thing…

Try now to imagine what America will look like in the coming bad years.

Imagine houses down another 20 percent. Imagine the Dow tumbling back to the 6000 level. Imagine over one in eight workers without a job.

Imagine another eight years of falling stock prices…and two or three more years of falling housing prices…and more and more government bailouts.

This crisis is moving fast.

Stay on top of events with critical updates from Contrarian Profits.

These will be delivered via Notes from the Investment Underground, a new daily email service that reveals how you can prevail in the coming bad years.

Simply enter your email below to get your first issue. This service is FREE to readers of this report.

Imagine consumers going on a rampage of thrift…credit cards in the trash…the nation’s malls going silent…even more bankruptcies.

Now try to imagine Barack Obama…or the hacks in Congress…or the Bernanke Fed saying “No” to the demand for more money, “No” to more bailouts, “No” to more rebates and “No” to more spending.

Imagine a Paul Volcker striding into the Fed and saying, “No more credit! We’re going to protect the dollar and the financial integrity of the United States government.”

Can you imagine it? We can’t.

We believe Bernanke will be true to his word when he said he’d “drop money from helicopters” rather than see the US in a Japan-like slump.

In fact, although there have been no helicopter sightings in the sky above Wall Street, Bernanke’s adoption of Japanese-style “quantitative easing” amounts to the same thing -– throwing unlimited amounts of money at the problem.

This is when this correction shifts from correcting not only the biggest bubble in history but also the entire post-1971 money system.

Here is what Austrian School economist Ludwig von Mises had to say about the dire situation now facing the US economy.

There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner, as a result of the voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later, as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved.

This was not merely an academic observation. Mises had been a first-hand witness to the economic and social collapse of hyperinflation in Germany and central Europe in the years after World War I.

Now, similar conditions loom in the US.

The dollar has rallied again. But it’s a fake rally.

Speaking to the Financial Times recently, famed investor Jim Rogers said the dollar rally is due to massive short covering and an unprecedented flight to cash, not because of underlying strength.

President of Euro Pacific Capital Peter Schiff agrees. Schiff has been accurately predicting this crisis since mid-2006. And we think he is right about the dollar, too.

Speaking on CNBC recently, Schiff said, “The dollar is rallying for the same reason that real estate rallied or that dot.coms rallied — it’s not because of the fundamentals.”

He also warned that the “total catastrophe” of the US currency system is fast approaching.

In fact, according to Schiff, the “credit crunch” is not the problem at all.

The problem is much, much bigger government under President Obama. It’s the trillions of dollars the US is borrowing that it can’t pay back. It’s the gaping hole in the government’s entitlement programs that will leave millions of baby boomers without a safety net. It’s that all the stimulus packages and all the bailout packages that have passed so far are making the underlying problem worse and setting us up for a much bigger disaster.

It’s not that people will go to the bank and not be able to take out money. It’s that people going to the bank will be able to take out money, but they won’t be able to buy anything with the money they take out.

You have been warned. Unlike the ill-fated residents of Pompeii, you need not wait until the eruptions overwhelm your world before you try to escape.

Now it’s the time to act.

The Known Unknowns

So far, we have attempted to address how we got into this mess and what will likely happen next as the global financial meltdown progresses.

Here we take a shot at telling you how to avoid losing what money you have (how not be a turkey) and maybe how to even make some.

Of course, the scope of this report is limited.

What we want to share with you here are some investing principles that will help you avoid being chumped by Wall Street as the global economic depression takes hold.

It may come as a surprise, but experts say that 90 percent of traders eventually lose their money.

It doesn’t surprise us much. We have been around the investment markets far too long. In fact, the number seems to us to be rather low.

Markets are unpredictable. They are infinitely complex and often chaotic systems.

What we see are several overlapping and disruptive factors, almost as if several fault lines came together at the same place in the earth. If one of them moved, it could cause some trouble, but if all of them went together, that would cause a tremendous earthquake of economic change.

- James Dale Davidson, 1992

And that’s before you take into account the recent ballooning of complex financial instruments such as credit default swaps, collateralized debt obligations and other leveraged derivative contracts.

Unfortunately, most investors refuse to accept this.

Don’t just take our word for it. According to one of the pioneers of financial derivatives Nassim Taleb, “Never before in the history of the world has there been so much complexity combined with so much incompetence and lack of understanding the problems this causes.”

We think this is probably a sound start.

The truth is we live in a world we don’t understand. But we refuse to behave accordingly. (Often there is the appearance of stability…but it should never be taken for the real thing.)

Making matters worse is that the financial world is now precariously interconnected.

Globalization means there is now the prospect of global financial collapse. Consolidation in the banking system means that all it takes is one big bank to fail for the entire banking system to be at risk.

Heck, according to mathematicians, the behavior of economic phenomena is now more complicated than the behavior of liquids or gases!

Survival Is Key

There is one very important question you need to ask yourself before we move on…

What do you really want?

You might say that you want to be rich. Who doesn’t? But we urge you first to think carefully about the best way of achieving this.

If you had money in stocks, you most likely lost some of it in the great stock-market crash of 2008. Given that world stock values have dropped by about 40 percent, you may have even lost your shirt.

By now, you’ve probably realized stocks are no “sure thing.”

Another popular way you might have being going about getting rich was by going into debt.

Debt is king right now in America. The average Joe is saddled with tons of the stuff. A rate of debt to disposable income of about 140 percent is now the national average. This has risen from 70 percent in the early 1990s to 100 percent in 2000.

But as we’ve seen over recent months, this method has its drawbacks.

Instead, we suggest another route to wealth: spend less.

This is tried-and-tested method carries very little downside…other than being deeply unpopular in a world where spending is king.

In fact, most Americans have come to believe that they need never save again.

And why wouldn’t they?

During the boom years, one of the easiest ways of feeling rich was to spend – whether it is with a credit card or a home equity loan.

And spend we did…so much so that personal bankruptcies are now skyrocketing.

Thrift may not have been very popular during the boom years when the Fed was splashing credit around like cheap bubbly at a party. But it is one of the best ways we know of avoiding the bankruptcy courts.

What can people do now to protect themselves financially?

Well, as James explained in a 1992 cover story for The Futurist magazine in which he predicted another “Great (and very violent) Depression,” you “ought to begin to behave as if a depression had already begun.”

If you reduce their expenses and save more money, you will be far ahead of the game.

We recommend you try to save 20 to 25 percent of your income.

Now, many people say that’s impossible, that it simply can’t be done. But of course it’s possible, because the US standard of consumption is now five times what it was in 1929, when the country had the highest savings rate in the world.

So there’s no reason that the United States can’t have a high savings rate again when its standard of consumption is so much higher.

Survival is key right now. Then, maybe, years from now, we can put our financial lives back together again…and get on with things.

Don’t Follow the Crowd

Follow the crowd and you’ll get slaughtered in this crisis.

If you do what everyone else does, you will get the same returns as everyone else. And giving the state of the markets, that means negative returns.

If you want to do better – that is keep your head above water and even make some gains – you’ll have to do something different.

As contrarian fund manager Rick Rule puts it, “You’re either a contrarian or a victim.”

So get some good advice.

Find an independent investment guru with a good track record and stick with him.

As Bill wrote last year in Mobs, Messiahs and Markets:

What dooms the average investor is the same mushy quality that seems to be ruining the whole country. He will wait in line – without a word of protest – while the guards frisk Girl Scouts and old ladies for dangerous weapons. He cheers on the troops as though they were a football team. And he will believe any line of guff -– no matter how fantastic — as long as everyone else falls for it. Dow at 36,000? House prices always up? Interest-only neg-am mortgage?

Investors who follow newsletter gurus have no guarantee of making money. But those who follow the crowd are practically guaranteed that they won’t!

If an investor merely recognizes the way mob sentiment works, he is way ahead of most punters.

Never Play on a Level Field

At the other extreme, investors who are unaware of the dangers of the crowd lose money because they become patsies in the public spectacle.

They read the newspapers. They watch the TV. They listen to the network pundits. As a result, they become the buyers to whom the elite sell. They become the sellers from whom the elite buy. They watch Jim Cramer and forget to smirk.

They are nothing more than mass-market speculators.

Keep these investors in your sights, the way a hunter targets a deer.

You need to know what they are doing…and do the opposite.

The real speculator therefore has an advantage. He knows his mass-market competition. And this tilts the playing field in his favor.

He knows you don’t get rich by predicting the future. The mark of a real speculator is he looks for bets that are not fair.

Buy Cheap Hard Assets and Valuable Commodities

They say a low price is a sign of inner grace. And one sector that’s cheap right now is commodities.

This is really nothing more than what Bill has been calling the Trade of the Decade: “Sell stocks. Buy gold.”

Bill has been advising readers of The Daily Reckoning to do just this for years.

The decade has some months to run yet. But from where we stand now, it’s still looking like a pretty sensible call.

We see no reason to drop this advice. As DailyWealth editor Steve Sjuggerud put it, “Buy commodities now. Sell them in 2016.”

It’s a long-term play. But we think Steve is dead right.

Commodities prices are way down now. But this is a necessary correction to recent speculative excess. It’s not the end of the bull market that started about seven years ago.

Commodities have not reached their peaks yet…not by a long shot.

Click Here to Play with Media Player

Key points summary:

* There are great opportunities in panic sold commodity equities
* We are in a secular bull in commodities
* The industry is living off of mines developed 30 years ago
* Credit crisis limits new supplies of base metals and energy
* Developing nations didn’t get entangled in financial crisis
* Poorer people spend money on things that have large inputs of natural resources
* Competition from developed nations will only increase
* Credit will be difficult to obtain for natural resource projects for the next 2 to 3 years
* Very bullish on gold in 3 to 5 years

Demand for food will keep increasing as the world population grows and urban sprawl eats up more and more farmland.

Take grains.

The average Chinese person consumes about 2,500 calories a day. Same as the Taiwanese. The difference is the average Taiwanese person eats about nine times more meat.

The Chinese, of course, are catching up. Meat consumption in China is rising at a rate of about 20 percent a year.

The outcome for grains is obvious. Demand is rising. (It takes nine units of grain to produce on unit of meat.)

Or take water.

We believe one of the most dynamic and profitable themes for the rest of this decade will be investing in water.

As commodities investor Chris Mayer puts it, “Clean drinking water is a far more precious commodity than oil.”

Although water makes up the majority of the Earth’s surface, less than three percent of it is drinkable. Pollution and disease has made much of that water undrinkable.

And unlike oil, recessions don’t make demand for drinkable water go away.

Same goes for food.

Investing in a company that supplies grains to hungry people looks like a better bet to us than investing in one that sells mortgages to people who can’t afford them.

The US economy has become far too dependent on the finance sector, on easy credit and on the real-estate market. Now the chickens are coming home to roost.

This phony formula worked for a while. But now America has caught one on the chin thanks to its over reliance on these sectors.

As a result, we believe the post-depression profits will be in exactly the opposite places – in hard assets, in food, in precocious resources. The focus will shift to things we need, rather than things we want.

Buy Gold

There has been a lot of hand wringing about gold recently.

At about $950 an ounce at the time of writing, gold is a long ways off its March 2008 peak of $1,030.80.

But the bull market in gold –- the long-term uptrend since 2001 — is intact. Gold would have to close below $650 to break it

Sure, gold and gold stocks have been hammered along with everything else in this crisis as investors and institutions seek cash.

But as we have already covered, the Fed and the Treasury are flooding the system with money as they try to resuscitate the flat-lining credit markets.

And when we say flooding, we mean flooding.

As Jim Grant of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer recently observed, the Fed took 75 years –- from 1914 to 1989 –- to get its balance sheet up to $100 billion.

From there, Alan Greenspan took only another ten years to bring it to $500 billion.

Eight years or so later, the Fed’s balance sheet hit $1 trillion. And within the space of just three weeks in late 2008, Ben Bernanke doubled that from $1 trillion to $2 trillion.

“So a second order effect which might not be subtle,” Grant suggests, “might be inflation.”

As our colleague Martin Hutchinson — an investment banker with more than 25 years’ experience on Wall Street — puts it, “Gold is not a safe haven against recession. It’s a safe haven against inflation.”

Of course, deflation –- not inflation -– is the immediate threat.

But there are no two ways about it. The Obama administration is spending like a drunken sailor right now as it tries to reinflate the economy.

And Obama is going to spend even more.

This is long-term bearish for the dollar and long-term bullish for gold.

The Coming Depression Forecast in a Nutshell

We’ve covered a lot of ground. So, let’s pause for a moment and catch our breath while reviewing the main points of this emergency report:

• The last seven years of ‘growth’ were actually a Fed-inspired hyper-bubble, not a legitimate boom. Investors’ losses have already been profound. But they will deepen.
• House prices have further to fall. This will cause more mortgage-related writedowns and losses and further tighten credit.
• We can expect the Dow to bottom somewhere around 5,000 points. This may not happen immediately. We may see a giant “sucker’s rally” first. This will be a good time to sell.
• Extreme volatility will most likely continue throughout 2009.
• If the feds manage to avoid a deflationary spiral by cranking up the printing press, inflation and a declining dollar are unavoidable.

Thank you for reading.

Good luck.

P.S. Remember, you can get critical updates to this report from Contrarian Profits by joining the Notes from the Investment Underground email list.

Surviving and prospering in the coming bad years means first appreciating what you have. Economic depression doesn’t mean that you should become depressed.

Notes from the Investment Underground is a special new daily email service that will show how to live beyond yourself, not beyond your means.

Simply enter your email address to get your first issue.

It’s free to readers of this report.

It’s amazing how much hustle and bustle there can be in a town supported by government spending.

I’m talking about the capital of Oregon and the town I’m spending Christmas at, Salem.

Here, the government with its four state penitentiaries and state offices is the number one employer. That’s not the only way Oregon State supports its people, though. One out of six Oregonians are on food stamps. And unemployment benefits are way up.

God forbid you try and drive the streets in December, though. A three mile drive to the other side of town could take you 45 minutes.

I shouldn’t be shocked, though. After all, this is what a 7%-11% variable state tax produces: A false sense of normalness.

You see Oregon, like much of the US, is suffering a structural problem in its economy. The problem is that the state hasn’t fully switched over to new types of jobs.

Everything here is a little dated, down to the advertising. The state used to get a lot of support from timber mills. But that changed in the 80′s. From oregonlive.com…

Since the 1980s the lack of a national forest plan is a major reason Oregon has had 200 timber mills close, causing some 50,000 people to lose their jobs. Much of rural Oregon has been economically ruined. Many rural towns used to have a lumber mill. Now most are gone. Rural counties have been providing services for their citizens by using federal timber money in the county payments program that in 2012 will cease. Oregon will have to keep these counties afloat.

We have lost thousands of aluminum industry jobs because of plant closures. More than half of our pulp and paper mills have closed, costing thousands of jobs. Major steel plants have closed, costing thousands of jobs. Heavy construction has lost thousands of jobs. Machine manufacturing plants have closed, costing thousands of jobs. The high-tech industry has lost thousands of jobs. Transportation manufacturing has lost thousands of jobs. Oregon has lost thousands of food processing jobs.

The sad part is we’re still losing jobs, 120,000 since November 2007.

Oregon’s solution also mimics most of the US: create government jobs to pick up the slack from private demand. But that doesn’t work.

Politicians have dreams of power and grandeur. Years ago John Maynard Keynes gave politicians the idea that they could control the economy like a machine, through deficit spending and monetary policy. And they have been striving for it ever since.

Bush Jr tried by dropping interest rates to 1%, boosting stimulus spending during downturns, stating a war, and cutting taxes by over $1 trillion.

Today, Obama tries his hand at playing “god” by outdoing Bush Jr. In most regards, Obama is doing the same as Bush. He’s cutting some taxes, passing stimulus measures, and increasing military spending. But unlike Bush, Obama’s focus is on spending, not tax cuts.

He already passed a $787 billion stimulus package in February. He’s also promised to use some of the returned TARP cash to fund another stimulus program next year.

That’s on top of Cash for Clunkers and the hodge podge of other increased spending initiatives being passed, including the “Health” reform that purports to cut medical costs by adding a trillion dollars a year to health spending, without increasing the supply of doctors, hospitals and nurse by one iota.

I’m afraid that as long are people are worried about the economy, politicians will argue for more stimulus. And this stimulus will inevitably make its way back into the economy.

This makes it tricky to forecast the market.

If it weren’t for government intervention, the current rally would have ended long ago. It may not have even started, who knows?

But at some point, all of this cash flooding into the economy will lose its potency.

Is that point right now? It’s hard to say.

A quick look at the chart above of the Dow Jones shows my biggest concern.

You see, in previous issues James talked about how Quantitative Easing flooded the market with liquidity as the market began to move higher in March. Basically, the Fed poured cash into the hands of the primary dealers, probably with a wink and a nod understanding that they should use the “profits” from quantitative easing to buy the stock market. Our suspicion is based on the fact that the stock market bottomed at roughly the same time the Fed began buying Treasuries.

But here’s the problem. The Fed has stopped buying Treasuries and suddenly the stock market begins losing steam. By the first quarter of next year, the Fed’s QE program ceases completely.

Will the stock market drop as a result of reduced liquidity? It’s a risk that James and I think about, especially in this market.

As of now, though, the portfolio is still looking golden. No major news to announce this week, which is expected since Christmas is right around the corner.

Next week will be a light and short trading week since it’s a holiday. The Market will close on Thursday by 1 PM Eastern Time.

Be aware that light trading means we could see sharp moves up or down. But generally the market has an upward bias leading into the holiday.

Speaking of holidays, I hope you’ve got most of your shopping done. I finished last week by getting my Fiancé a digital picture frame and an iPod gift card for my nephew.

The bottom of my tree is getting packed.

Happy holidays!

Charles Delvalle.

They move trillions of dollars a day. And that makes them very powerful.

When bond traders see that Obama and the Federal Reserve are really serious about bringing about inflation, they will dump hundreds of billions of dollars in US bonds.

This will deal a deathblow to the dollar. The price of US Treasuries will plummet. Who in their right mind wants to be left holding a currency that’s plunging in value?

The only way to lure lenders back will be to raise yields on US government bonds.

Rising yields means higher mortgage rates… and higher borrowing costs at the consumer level… This will lead to the complete collapse of the highly leveraged U.S. economy.

It’s a nightmare scenario for the already seriously wounded US economy. But the government will have little choice. It will have saddled itself – and you – with an unbearably high burden of debt.

So what will Obama try to do to bail himself out of this seemingly impossible situation?

The Plan to Take Half of Your Money

Obama will have to raise taxes eventually.

And with the help of a super majority in the Democratic Congress, there’s nothing to stop him!

Larry Summers and other top advisors will be there with the academic mumbo-jumbo to justify it all.

In 2009 or the year after, Obama will go on nationwide TV. He’ll look us right in the eyes. And he’ll tell us that his program to raise the tax brackets to 39.6% for people earning over $250,000 has been so successful that he’s raising the rate to 42.9% and lowering the income level to $95,000!

 But That’s Not All!

Besides raising the tax brackets, Obama will raise a host of other new taxes, great and small.

• After 2010, the death tax will be resurrected – with a chip on its shoulder. And it will hit estates that haven’t been taxed since 2001.
• Medical benefits from your employer will be taxed.
• Capital gains rates will jump to suck what little life remains from the economy.

(These are just a few of the tax hikes that have been publicly acknowledged.  You should never doubt the creative new ways the government can come up with to steal your hard earned money.)

Remember, Obama will be slashing Social Security, Medicare and every other type of government spending. The victims of these cuts are going to be in a rage. They’re going to be baying for blood.

And Obama’s going to give them somebody’s blood: yours.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is not news. We’ve already seen Clinton’s strategy was to blame the rich.

When cornered, Obama will attack with the easiest tax target – estate taxes. You can count on it. Why should anyone inherit wealth? Obama is going to ask.

Maybe the parents have earned it, but the kids didn’t. Tax it away! Fairness!

In 2010, there is no estate tax. But like Jesus calling Lazarus forth from his grave, Obama “the Chosen One,” will say “Rise up!” And in 2011 the estate tax will hit anything over a million dollars with a top rate of 55%.

A million bucks… Sounds like a lot of money, right? But it’s not. Throw together your house, your car and a small stock portfolio and you get there pretty darn quick.

Anything over that, the feds are going to be taking over half! And they are closing a noose around your ability to give gifts while you’re still alive.

If you’re worth $1.5 million – once again, something that’s quite easy when you look at all your worldly possessions – your heirs will be paying $275,000 in new taxes. Just to the feds.

Throw in probate costs, state taxes, lawyers’ fees… and easily you could see a third of your wealth vanish into thin air.

Disinherit the IRS

Is there any salvation from these outrageous new taxes?

You bet! There are specific steps you can take right now to disinherit Mr. Obama’s IRS. But if you procrastinate a few months, you could lose big.

The newspapers will tell you that there’s not much you can do to hold onto your money. They are wrong.

You can rearrange your assets to avoid the new confiscatory income and estate taxes. Using trusts and other devices over the next two years can keep your money where it belongs – with your family and loved ones.

Put simply, it’s time to bury your wealth.

This will see you through the coming bad years. It will also be the foundation of our country to rebuild after Barack Obama is gone in 2012.

It’s now clear that most assets are going to go down in value. Our whole reason for publishing Strategic Investment is to tell you what’s going up – and what to avoid!